I adapted some pages on a production site, validated AMP and changed operation mode to normal.
Now I have two versions of the same Amp page:
V1: on the amp url without final slash .../amp I have the page I designed during development operation mode
V2: on the same page with final slash .../amp/ I have a reduced version equal to the version in the Google Amp cache.
It's is posible to see in the browser the html of both versions.
V1 maintains a lot of divs with the original css classes, which allows a nice design, close to the no-amp version, see the buttons. But is V1 AMP? Does it comply with AMP rules? This is the version I see during development with WeeblrAmp, it makes me happy.
V2 has less divs, changes divs for ps, etc. I suppose it complies with AMP rules. But it's reduduced in presentation and in content. I loose a lot of my original page. It's the page my mobile visitors see. Most visitors are mobile. V2 is not the page I want them to see. So I shut down Adwords for the moment. V2 also has the breaktags, see ticket 85.
I have invested quite some time to make this work. If something like V1 is what I can obtain with AMP then it may be worth the effort, if V2 is what AMP can give, then I will not use it on my sites, the display of normal pages on mobile I have is much better. That's the decision I have to make.
Do you think you can do something about it?
You can see this behavior on a production site. I copied also content to the test site where you can play around and make changes. But the problem V2 does not show there yet, may be because Google hasn't seen it yet, it's in development operation mode.
Kind regards
Now I have two versions of the same Amp page:
V1: on the amp url without final slash .../amp I have the page I designed during development operation mode
V2: on the same page with final slash .../amp/ I have a reduced version equal to the version in the Google Amp cache.
It's is posible to see in the browser the html of both versions.
V1 maintains a lot of divs with the original css classes, which allows a nice design, close to the no-amp version, see the buttons. But is V1 AMP? Does it comply with AMP rules? This is the version I see during development with WeeblrAmp, it makes me happy.
V2 has less divs, changes divs for ps, etc. I suppose it complies with AMP rules. But it's reduduced in presentation and in content. I loose a lot of my original page. It's the page my mobile visitors see. Most visitors are mobile. V2 is not the page I want them to see. So I shut down Adwords for the moment. V2 also has the breaktags, see ticket 85.
I have invested quite some time to make this work. If something like V1 is what I can obtain with AMP then it may be worth the effort, if V2 is what AMP can give, then I will not use it on my sites, the display of normal pages on mobile I have is much better. That's the decision I have to make.
Do you think you can do something about it?
You can see this behavior on a production site. I copied also content to the test site where you can play around and make changes. But the problem V2 does not show there yet, may be because Google hasn't seen it yet, it's in development operation mode.
Kind regards